McWane, Inc. Essay Example for Free

McWane, Inc. EssayMcWane, Inc. is a privately held company based in Birmingham, Ala., which owns plants across the country and Canada and who is bingle of the worlds largest manufacturers of cast iron sewer and water pipe (McWane Mess). From 1995-2003, McWane plants, in the U.S., had 4,600 sueer injuries (CBC News). The company was also cited for more than 400 safety violations and 450 environmental violations during that same period (Barstow, Foundry). Tyler Pipe, mavin of McWanes plants, was described by one its workers. He said it was a dim, dirty, hellishly hot place where men are regularly disfigured by amputations and burns, where turn all over is so high that convicts are recruited from local prisons, where some workers urinate in their pants be originator their bosses refuse to let them graduation away from the manufacturing line for even a few moments (Barstow and Bergman, Texas). A federal investigation began in January 2003, which was the same month The New York Times published a series of articles that described McWane as one of the nations most persistent violators of workplace safety and environmental laws (Barstow, Foundry).CAUSESRoot organizational driveways and regulatory weakness factors contributed to the McWane scandal. The structure at McWane contributed to the scandal because it was one of the root organizational causes. McWane Inc. is a privately held organization where the family and a few close individuals run it. The family is described as secluded and very(prenominal) private (Barstow and Bergman, Familys). Executives and family members repeatedly decline interview requests and rarely talk to the media (Barstow and Bergman, Familys). In 2007, of McWanes twenty-five divisions, only two included McWane in the name (Wisniewski). even so though McWanes divisions were places where the desperate seek work (Barstow and Bergman, Texas), society did non hold the right people accountable. Many individuals do not know McWane is co mmitted because the plant names rarely reflect their owner.Without interviews, the fact that it is a private company, and that it keeps its name off new divisions, McWane lacks transparency to help keep it accountable. The seclusion and concealing of the family makes it seem as though they stay out of the public eye for a reason. McWanes organizational finish was also a root cause that contributed to the scandal. One phrase was posted throughout the plants and was posted in large orange print REDUCE MAN HOURS PER TON (Barstow and Bergman, Texas). This phrase created a culture that drove all aspects of the McWane companies. McWane was not the best place to work. In fact, there were times when turnover was 100 percent at one plant (The McWane Mess). broad(prenominal) turnover is one measure of the culture at McWane and it shows how employees fit into that culture.The high turnover was disturbing and not normal for the industry. Acipco, a direct industry competitor, had a yearly tur nover of around half a percent (Barstow and Bergman, Familys). The organizational culture that focused on one key phrase continued into work shifts. There were two 12-hour shifts instead of the normal three shifts of eight hours. At the end of a shift, supervisors often called for four more hours of work. Therefore, employees worked 16-hour old age, sometimes seven days a week (Barstow and Bergman, Texas). Leadership was also a root organizational cause. McWane never developed a ashes to hold supervisors accountable for safety however, their system for holding supervisors accountable for production great dealtime (Barstow and Bergman, Texas). Federal rules require conveyor belts be shut off for maintenance.They also require that all belts have safety guards. The rules are important because they help observe workers from being caught and crushed. In one instance, inspectors discovered that a belt split upd both of those rules (Barstow and Bergman, Texas). This negligence contribu ted to one of the nine deaths that occurred at McWane divisions from 1995-2003 (Barstow and Bergman, Deaths). Leaders in the company gave orders that were in clear violation of laws. Another example of leadership was what to do with 200 old tires. It would have cost nigh $750 to have them brought to a waste dump. However, documents show that a plant passenger vehicle ordered the tires be burned, even though he had been notified burning tires violated air-quality laws (Barstow and Bergman, Texas). The managers desire the one above were partially victim to those higher up.The leadership style at McWane was clearly a top down approach. One plant manager stated, I was like a robot. All that mattered was getting machines moving again after an accident (The McWane Mess). One risk manager says that a top down approach creates a disconnection between plant managers and executives. He also explains that this disconnection sum ups in privately held companies due to a lack of accountabilit y (The McWane Mess). OSHAs regulatory and oversight weakness contributed to the McWane scandal. At the time, the laws in place were not severe enough detour McWane from committing them.At the time of the scandal, the crime, of willfully violating safety rules that cause the death of a worker, was a misdemeanor. That crime was a less serious than harassing a wild burro on federal lands, which was punishable by up to one year in prison (Barstow and Bergman, Deaths). The fines McWane had to sacrifice for violations were lower than the cost of having the machines down due to implementing and following safety regulations. A McWane executive confessed that Tyler Pipe had willfully ignore workplace safety laws, a crime that caused the death of a worker.The company only paid a $250,000 fine (The McWane Mess). OSHA let off McWane through payments and it did not do more to ensure the safety of workers in McWane plants. Weak labor union oversight also played a role in alter to the scandal. The labor unions that represented McWane workers were usually small and overwhelmed with cases. The unions had no bargaining power because they were small, so they could not effectively protect their workers from low wages, hours per shift, or dangerous environments. A United Steelworkers union official attempted to tour Tyler Pipe with a safety and health specialist but had been rejected twice (The McWane Mess).CONSEQUENCESMcWane scandal had general consequences. Those consequences affected the company as well as the environment and manager at the plants. The scandal produced financial woes and a tainted reputation for McWane. McWane was ordered to pay $19 million in fines and restitution in 2006 (Barstow, Foundry). In addition, McWane was ordered to pay $8 million in fines for dozens of workplace safety and environmental crimes in 2009 (Barstow, Iron Pipe). The fines that McWane had to pay were substantially more than any other fines it had previously received. The McWane scandal also greatly affected the environment. As stated before, McWane had over 450 environmental violations (Barstow, Foundry).One of those incidents, the burnt tires, caused toxins to be released directly into the air. Another incident that McWane was charged with was illegally dumping cover into the Atlantic Ocean. McWane had dumped so much oil that it created an 8.5-mile-long slick (Barstow and Bergman, Familys). Lastly, the McWane scandal affected the lives of those managers who were charged criminally. Four McWane plant managers were convicted or pled guilty to committing environmental crimes (United States v. Atlantic). These people took risks that ended in tarnished reputations, criminal records, jail time, and sizeable fines.PREVENTIONPrevention is key so that scandals, like McWane, do not happen again. One preventative step is that the government has set stronger penalties for companies who repeatedly violate safety and environmental laws. The government has also set out bette r guidelines to prosecute repeat offenders (Barstow, Guilty Verdicts).Another preventative measure is that OSHA is looking to append its criminal enforcement arm. In four years, OSHA only sent 21 percent of eligible cases to the Department of Justice, and the DOJ acted on 4 percent (McGarity et al). If OSHA can increase its force, it can ensure the safety of more workers. The increased force would be a deterrent for companies, because the chances of it being charged would increase.One last way to prevent other scandal is to have the White House and Congress step up (McGarity et al). If these two groups could work together and provide OSHA with a larger budget, OSHA could and so improve everything that they do. It all comes down to the fact that OSHA is there for the people, but with a small budget, they cannot do the best job possible.Works CitedBarstow, David, and Lowell Bergman. At a Texas Foundry, an insensibility to Life. The New York Times 8 Jan. 2003. Print. Barstow, David, and Lowell Bergman. Deaths on the Job, Slaps on the Wrist. The New York Times 10 Jan. 2003. Print. Barstow, David, and Lowell Bergman. Familys Profits, Wrung From Blood and Sweat. The New York Times 9 Jan. 2003. Print. Barstow, David. Foundry Pleads Guilty to environmental Crimes. The New York Times 23 Mar. 2005. Print. Barstow, David. Guilty Verdicts in New Jersey Worker-Safety Trial. The New York Times 27 April 2006. Print. Barstow, David. Iron Pipe Maker Is Fined $8 one million million for Violations. The New York Times 25 Apr. 2009. Print. CBC News The Fifth Estate A Toxic Company The Canadian Connection. CBCnews. CBC/Radio Canada, 8 Jan. 2003. Web. McGarity, Thomas, Rena Steinzor, Sidney Shapiro, and Matthew Shudtz. Workers at Risk Regulatory Dysfunction at OSHA. The Center for Progressive Reform. Feb. 2010. Web. The McWane Mess. ISHN Magazine. BNP Media, 11 Feb. 2010. Web. United States v. Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Company Et Al. Fact Sheet. EPA.environmental Protectio n Agency, 9 June 2011. Web.Wisniewski, Barbara J. The McWane Story. McWane, 2012. Print.